在观看完一部作品以后,从中我们可以吸收新的思想,需要回过头来写一写观后感了。那么我们该怎么去写观后感呢?读书之法,在循序而渐进,熟读而精思,以下是勤劳的小编帮大家...
在观看完一部作品以后,从中我们可以吸收新的思想,需要回过头来写一写观后感了。那么我们该怎么去写观后感呢?读书之法,在循序而渐进,熟读而精思,以下是勤劳的小编帮大家找到的英语电影观后感(优秀3篇)。
电影观后感英文 篇一When you assume battle stations for "Pearl Harbor," make sure you sit near the aisle. Youve got three hours to withstand, and only about half of it is war. This is definitely a two-bathroom visit movie.
Its not the length that makes a movie good or bad. Its the pacing. Some three-hour movies, like "Lawrence of Arabia," just glide by. But movies like "Pearl Harbor" drag along because they 。 。 。 take 。 。 。 their 。 。 。 time 。 。 。 about 。 。 。 everything.
Put it this way: When a Japanese military officer reports that "the task force" is 320 miles north of Pearl Harbor, were one hour and 20 minutes into the movie. By then, youre ready to bomb something yourself.
Perhaps they should have called this "Bore-a, Bore-a, Bore-a."
Incidentally, although this Walt Disney movie is based, inspired and even partially informed by a real event referred to as Pearl Harbor, the movie is actually based on the movies "Top Gun," "Titanic" and "Saving Private Ryan." Dont get confused.
And dont be worried about emotional intensity. Its going to take a special effort on your part (probably informed by firsthand wartime experience in World War II) to actually appreciate the emotional impact of what happened on Dec. 7, 1941. "Pearl Harbor"-the-movie, produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay (also the director), doesnt evoke that time so much as turn it into a pre-Fourth of July fireworks show.
The movies emotional impact is not helped by the characters. By the time the Japanese are blowing ships out of the water, we have met (and already become sick of) our blandly delineated sweethearts, flying-crazy pilot Rafe McCawley (Ben Affleck) and intelligent, dedicated nurse Evelyn Johnson (Kate Beckinsale)。
We have also observed the lifelong friendship between Rafe and his pal Danny Walker (Josh Hartnett)。 The movie starts with Rafe and Danny as kids, sitting in a motionless crop duster plane, pretending to shoot enemy planes. Some two hours later, theyll be mounting the American counterattack against the Japanese. "Danny, lets play some chicken with these Jap suckers!" yells Rafe.
In what amounts to a superfluous first hour, Rafe, desperate for military action in pre-Pearl Harbor days, volunteers for the Royal Air Force. Suddenly, hes missing, leaving Evelyn and Danny to pick up the pieces and each other. Why waste time worrying if hell reappear in time for Pearl Harbor as well as a romantic dogfight with Danny? Hes Ben Affleck, the movies top-billed player.
Theres more to this so-so movie, including a completely formulaic subplot starring Cuba Gooding Jr. as a ships cook who boxes and machine-guns his way to r-e-s-p-e-c-t (loosely based on a real person, Doris "Dorie" Miller), and Hans Zimmers relentlessly syrupy score. But lets cut to the chase: those central 40 minutes of blitzkrieg special effects. Isnt that why people will be lining the block? My take: The visuals are well done but not mind-blowingly memorable. It would take a director far more gifted than Bay to outdo James Cameron in "Titanic." Perhaps intimidated by this, Bay gives us many scenes featuring marooned men in the water, and many others stuck inside majestic, sinking hulls. And when the Japanese planes strafe those men, he goes underwater – like Steven Spielberg did in "Saving Private Ryan" – to show the cool, glossy white trajectories the tracer bullets make underwater.
Obviously, imitation will get you everywhere.
英语电影英文观后感 篇二The crown jewel of 1995's summer blockbusters appears to have arrived early. It's hard to imagine any motion picture released between now and August matching Mel Gibson's Braveheart for spectacle. With its clashing armies,heartstopping action,and grand sense of romance,this is the sort of film it's a pleasure to see and review.
Let me state my preferences up front. I'm a big fan of the epic adventure,a category in which Braveheart,like cream,rises to the top. There's a lot in this film that's praiseworthy -- not the least of which is its ambition. Those viewing this picture may be easily reminded of Gettysburg,The Last of the Mohicans,Glory,and such classics as Lawrence of Arabia,El Cid,and )一米范文○www.1mi.net(Spartacus. The grandeur is certainly present;nevertheless,Gibson gives us not only memorable battles,but characters of real substance.
Borrowing from masters like Sam Peckinpah and David Lean,the actor/director has crafted an exceptional cinematic tapestry in only his sophomore effort. Most of the time,three hour movies have a few flat spots,but Braveheart is constantly on the move -- riveting from start to finish. When the end credits began to roll,I was hard pressed to accept that nearly 170 minutes had elapsed.
The title character is William Wallace (Gibson),a hero of Scottish history whose legend has surely outstripped fact (in its own unique way,the film acknowledges this). Wallace fought for Scotland's freedom in the late 13th century,wielding his broadsword and influence to defeat the forces of King Edward I (Patrick McGoohan),the British monarch who had declared himself king of Scotland upon the former ruler's demise.
Braveheart builds slowly to its first gritty climax. Much of the early film concentrates on Wallace's love for Murron (Catherine McCormack). Their courtship is unhurried,yet this is all preparation. The real meat of the story,which includes political mechanations,betrayal,and dramatic battles,is yet to come. Patrick Henry once said,"Give me liberty,or give me death!" That might well be Wallace's motto. "It's all for nothing if you don't have freedom!" The nobles of Scotland fight for land and riches,but Wallace stands for the inpidual,and earns respect with words and deeds.
Bulked up and wearing a long-haired wig,Gibson brings his usual wealth of charisma to the title role. Patrick McGoohan,best known from TV's Secret Agent Man and The Prisoner,is almost unrecognizable beneath a snowy beard. His Edward the Longshanks exudes an aura of cold menace. He's a worthy foe for Wallace because his intelligence matches his ruthlessness. Sophie Marceau,the French actress who plays Princess Isabelle,and Catherine McCormack are both immensely appealing.
Braveheart is a brutal,bloody motion picture,but the violence is not gratuitous. The maimings,decapitations,and other assorted gruesome deta ils make Wallace's world seem real and immediate. In addition,few theatrical moments make a more eloquent statement against war than when Gibson shows women and children weeping over the dead on a body-littered battlefield. War is a two-headed beast,and both faces -- the glorious and the tragic -- are depicted.
Lately,certain films have come in pairs: two Robin Hoods,two Columbuses,two Earps,and now two Highlander epics. Rob Roy,the first,is a fine motion picture. Braveheart,however,is better,offering an exhilarating,and occasionally touching,experience that has viewers leaving the theater caught up in an afterglow of wonder. These days,heros like William Wallace are as rare as motion picture displays of this high,uncompromising quality.
电影观后感英文 篇三Film Review of Pride and Prejudice
Pride and Prejudice is a famous classic written by Jane Austen. I was attracted by the characters and plots of the film adapted from the novel.
Elizabeth is the heroine of the story. When she meets Darcy, a handsome, rich but arrogant man, on the party for the first time, she is dissatisfied with the proud manner of Darcy. Darcy looks down on those who are in a lower social class,including Elizabeth. However, after getting to know the courage, independence and confidence of Elizabeth, he almost falls in love with her. But Elizabeth believes the lies of Wickham which causes her great prejudice to Darcy. She rejects Darcy’s propose marriage to protect her self-respect. Finally, Darcy goes away because he couldn’t tolerate Elizabeth’s sisters’ vulgar manners. He writes a long letter to explain his thoughts and love to Elizabeth. After reading it, Elizabeth feels guilty about misjudging Darcy and regrets turning him down. As time goes away, Darcy gradually improves his pride and keeps helping Elizabeth’s family out from troubles. At last, Elizabeth removes the prejudice to Darcy and accepts his propose marriage.
From the film I learn that we can’t judge a man immediately by the first impression. If we are controlled by our subjective senses, it will easy cause prejudice and misunderstanding and probably influent the developments of many events. To avoid this situation, we need more communication to understand others deeply by ourselves.